Blogcat’s Take, 5/30

Posted by on May 30, 2008 in Denver Nuggets, Detroit Pistons, Golden State Warriors, Memphis Grizzlies | 0 comments

Since we’re in the college acceptance season, let’s do a sentence completion exercise…for fun! Here goes: the Celtics are to the NBA what violence was to The Sopranos. Think about it: when the Celtics are up, everyone’s impression of the NBA is up. And when the Celtics are down, the NBA is seen as having a “down” year. Similarly, anytime there was a particularly bloody stretch on The Sopranos, it was universally regarded as a great show and generated water-cooler talk. But whenever the shooting stopped for long stretches and Tony did mundane, non-violent things (like spend multiple episodes in a coma), loyal viewers grew frustrated and casual fans turned away.

To understand the Celtics’ impact, simply compare this season and last season. Ostensibly, both had several common features: both had heated MVP races culminating in first-time winners (Dirk & Kobe), both had solid if unspectacular Rookies of the Year (Roy and Durant), both had highly competitive Western Conference Playoff races (5 50+ win teams last year, 8 this year), and both had teams blatantly tanking for purposes of draft positioning (Celtics & Bucks last year, Heat & Grizzlies this year).

The differences between 06-07 and 07-08, as far as I can tell, are pretty minor. Definitely this year had more blockbuster trades (and the impact was magnified because two of them involved…Boston!), but last year did see Iverson getting shipped off to Denver. Last year was marred by the Nuggets-Knicks “brawl” (or “minor altercation,” as it was known to us non-ignorant NBA fans) and a sketchy All-Star Game. This year also had the “feel-good story” of the New Orleans Hornets, but I’d argue that Golden State’s finish last year was—if not in the neighborhood—at least a suburb of comparability. In both years, the playoffs were a mixed bag.

But the biggest difference between this year and last year is the Celtics. It’s probably because they bring a large, disproportionately vocal fan base, full of old-time (Bob Ryan) and younger (Bill Simmons) tastemakers alike. Thus, their concerns end up being everyone’s concerns. For instance, when the team tanked last year, all of a sudden the league as a whole had a problem with tanking. This year? Tanking was no big deal, even though it was—if anything—more blatant (two words: “Patrick Riley”).

So here’s the interesting part. The final season of The Sopranos drew more fans than ever, and a big part of it had to do with the escalating body count. But the last episode left roughly half the audience alienated, the general complaint being that it lacked an “ending.” I firmly believe that by “ending,” most people meant “some sort of bloody shootout, preferably involving Tony dying in a pinwheeling spray of blood and diner food.” In other words, it was a great last season until the end, when no violence = fan frustration.

Meanwhile, this year’s NBA has seen the Celtics rise to the best record, hence viewership and casual interest have correspondingly escalated, and the season has been universally heralded as one of the best in recent memory. But how will it end? The “dream match-up,” of course, is the Celtics-Lakers, while anything else is going to be like watching Meadow spend 5 minutes parking a car.

Full disclosure: I’m a diehard loyalist of both the NBA and The Sopranos. I’ve never not loved the NBA, even when it’s supposedly going through a “down” year. For example, I was one of a handful of people in the country absolutely mesmerized by the virtuoso shooting prowess of Chris Gatling in 1995. Similarly, I have and will continue to defend every Sopranos episode ever, including the final one (to all those who complained about the last episode, I ask you this: what more did you deranged sickos want? Phil Leotardo got his head run over by a car, for goodness’ sake, was that not enough? And just who precisely was supposed to kill Tony at the end?—he made his peace with everyone, including the Feds. You all are depraved.) So I’ll be happy either way, whether the Celtics make it or not. I enjoy the Spurs, and it’s not like the Pistons and Lakers have no history of their own.

Full disclosure #2: Before I get a bunch of hate-mail about how stupid/pointless this article is, I was on a conference call again. I’m telling you, stay away from those things. Only once the calls are done…that I feel like dying, I feel like dying.

Random epilogue: speaking of violence, if you’re ever bored, I’ve got a fun activity for you to try at home: watch a really violent movie with Closed-Captioning on. This past weekend, I DVR’d the utterly degenerate and quasi-fascist film 300, but because my wife was trying to work in the other room, all the screaming and axe-on-flesh noises were distracting her. So I turned the sound down and enabled the Closed-Captioning function, and the results were downright comical. In fact, I couldn’t resist copying down one of the scenes word-for-word. Looking over it, it’s hard to say if this is the dialogue from a movie or the minutes from the President’s latest Cabinet meeting. Check it out:

(All grunting)
(Grunts)
(Distorted grunts and yells)
(Grunting)
(Growling)
(Growling)
(Grunts)
“Father!
(Growling)
(Grunts)
(Breathing heavily)
(Growling)
(Snarls)
(Heavy, thudding footsteps, growling)
(Grunts)
(Roars)
“My king!”
(Growling softly)
(Breathing heavily)
(Sharp tinging)
(Grunts)
(Growling fiercely)
(Growling)
(Thud)
“Arcadians, now!”
“Go Show the Spartans what we can do!”
“Go!”
NARRRATOR: “They shout and curse, stabbing wildly, more brawlers than warriors. They make a wondrous mess of things. Brave amateurs, they do their part.”

Read More

Blogcat’s take 4/15

Posted by on Apr 15, 2008 in Golden State Warriors, Indiana Pacers | 0 comments

(Note: This is what I get for posting this late: first, the Pacers go on to get eliminated from the playoffs, rendering the second paragraph moot; second, Bob Johnson publicly vents his frustrations over the taxing life of being a billionaire sports owner, making a bunch of claims that–though I haven’t read them thoroughly yet–are undoubtedly a) unintentionally funny, and b) intentionally hypocritical.  I promise more analysis later in the week.)
You know how I was making fun of Shawn Marion the other day?  Well, it’s worth mentioning that Marion’s antithesis is Joakim Noah.  Reading Noah’s comments (he’s got a recurring journal in SLAM this year) after Marion’s is like chasing grapefruit juice with a cherry Slurpee.  I’m still slapping my knee over Noah’s recap of a game against the Knicks at the Garden. “They came out for me, my people from 51st Street and 10th Ave.  That’s how we do it,” wrote Noah, later adding that his family and friends “look good on him.”  Anyone who’s even vaguely familiar with the layout of Manhattan knows how ridiculous this sounds.  51st and 10th Ave??  I live over in the East Village, where it’s not uncommon to see men openly walk around in dresses, and I think I’m even more hood than that.  I’m surprised Noah didn’t give a shout-out to his homies in the “Bear Sterns projects” and tell them to keep their heads up.  But I’m laughing with Noah, not at him, because he’s a total crackup, is team-first, and probably a joy to be around.  Even when he’s understated (like when he described the situation in Iraq as “kind of disappointing”), he’s a treat to experience.  And he can rebound—we could have used him this year.
 
Oddly, we didn’t need Noah on Saturday night against Indiana.  “Rebounding was the key,” Matt Carroll said of the Bobcats’ 107-103 victory over the Pacers. “There have been a lot of games this year when we were on the opposite end of the rebounding total. It’s been our Achilles’ heel.”  Similarly, the Bobcats have been Indiana’s Achilles’ heel, taking 3-of-4 games from them this year.  Now the Pacers will play with the sword of Damocles over their heads, because they need to win their remaining two games and have Atlanta lose their two in order to seize the last playoff slot.  In short, it’ll take a Herculean effort.
 
Okay, enough with the Greek allusions.  The rebounding disparity in the series finale with Indiana—59-43 in favor of us, including a preposterous 20 offensive boards—was somewhat befuddling, especially when the Pacers had home court and an urgent mandate to win.  However, before you ask why we can’t do this more often, just look at Indiana’s center situation: Jeff Foster started, and he can barely make a put-back, let alone a long-range jumper; and Jermaine O’Neal continued playing desultory minutes.  The only other big of consequence, Troy Murphy, took just 2 shots (and missed them both).  Thus, when the opposition has a front court as limited in their offensive capabilities as our own, we look good by comparison. 
 
All of this makes me wonder what Rod Higgins’ current relationship with Andris Biedrins is like.  Because they were together with Golden State, do you think there’s any chance Higgins has enough goodwill to lure Biedrins over here?  If I remember correctly, AB wanted something in the neighborhood of $10 mil at the beginning of the season, and the Warriors were having none of it.  If both parties are still stalemated, Higgins could be our opening.  Biedrins is three years younger than Emeka Okafor and three million cheaper, plus he’s more offensively gifted and a certain double-double if given enough minutes. 
 
Two final thoughts about the Pacers: first, watching our guards chase around Flip Murray was semi-depressing, because I couldn’t help but wonder how this season would have gone if we’d had Flip on our team all along.  It’s not like he wasn’t available or overly expensive. Effective backup point guards are so abundant nowadays, I just don’t see how we failed so spectacularly to acquire one.  I’ll admit it: Earl Boykins never materialized into what I’d hoped, although I still argue that he was better than Jeff McInnis—at least somebody had to cover Earl.  Come draft time, I’m leaning closer and closer to advocating a big guy with rebounding ability and picking up a veteran backup PG second-hand. 
The other thought was, what happened to Jermaine O’Neal?  He seems a shell of himself.  I never hear from him anymore, and frankly, I miss him.  He used to have opinions that were refreshingly honest—he was the original Noah.  Now he just looks like he needs a good cry, possibly after a psychiatrist tells him repeatedly that it’s not his fault. 

Read More

Blogcat’s Take, 3/6

Posted by on Mar 6, 2008 in Golden State Warriors, Minnesota Timberwolves, San Antonio Spurs | 0 comments

Oooh yeah, three in a row!  Not since the halcyon days of November 1st to the 19th have we looked this good.  Apparently, Jeff McInnis’ way with the Dark Side was more powerful than even I thought.  Even without Gerald Wallace, we racked up one W on the road and another over a playoff-hungry Warriors team.  Granted, the Minnesota T-Wolves are the NBA equivalent of William Hung: sort of endearing and inspiring, but mostly untalented.  Have you seen these guys?  They’re all sort of misshapen, almost like they’re defective models off the NBA player assembly line.  Craig Smith is kind of rotund and overly sweaty, Corey Brewer is skinny, Marko Jaric is squinty, Randy Foye’s kind of stocky, Bassy Telfair is kind of slow and small and can’t really shoot, Antoine Walker is kind of a salary dump, etc.    
 
Even that “Wolf howl” sound effect blasts over the PA system at inappropriate moments.  I swear I heard one after Jason Richardson drilled a 3-pointer.  They also have a pair of television announcers who are unmatched in their ability to generate awkward silences after weird, vaguely homoerotic outbursts.  After a generic put-back, one of them inexplicably yelled out, “Kirk Snyder is GOOD!!” (ensuing long silence).  The best shout-out was, “Emeka Okafor is a MAN!” (ensuing long silence).  Not “the man,” mind you, “a man.”  I also took offense to one of them asserting that Jason Richardson is “the first go-to guy in Bobcats history.”  Excuse me?  Obviously, these guys have never heard of the legend that is Jason Hart.
 
None of this stopped the Wolves from getting indignant over a loss to the likes of us.  Head coach Randy Wittman went all Neville Chamberlain afterward.  "Tonight we tried to have a nonaggression pact with the other team, from the first play of the game to the last play of the game," Wittman said. "That's disappointing."  Wait, did he just compare Sam Vincent to Hitler? 
 
Then came the Warriors.  You know how there’s been an endless debate over who are the biggest trade-deadline “winners” and “losers”?  Here’s my choice for a winner: Chris Webber.  He’s got to be thanking his lucky boosters that this year’s deadline wasn’t as quiet as last year’s, otherwise people would have had nothing better to do than focus on what a terrible acquisition he’s been: 9 games, 14 minutes per, 4 points, 2 assists, 4 reboards (and all these numbers rounded up).  Fortunately for him, the plethora of deals has completely taken the spotlight off his disastrous reunion with Golden State.            
 
As for the game itself, the Warrior roared out of the gate with 38 first-quarter points.  Sam Vincent had to call two timeouts, and it had the same demoralizing effect as a boxer receiving two standing 8-counts in the first round.  Monta Ellis was so fast that at times he seemed to be moving through people; he’s like X-Men’s Kitty Pryde if she also had the ability to draw lots of shooting fouls.  Given Ellis’s speed, it’s mystifying why they didn’t just give the rock to him for the last 5-and-a-half minutes when they were ahead 106-105—he seemed a mortal lock to either score or draw the foul every time he had the ball.  Instead, Stephen Jackson, Kelenna Azubuike, and Al Harrington all missed two 3-pointers apiece, and we pulled away for the win.
 
But I’m skipping a whole bunch.  Before all this came a stunning turnaround of a 2nd quarter, in which we cut their first quarter scoring by half (just 19 points) and came storming back to take a 2-point lead at the intermission, spearheaded by Earl Boykins’ 9 points in the period.  Matt Carroll scrapped for 11 boards and 4 steals, and Okafor got to the foul line 18 times.  Our two most positive trends lately—Richardson and Jared Dudley—also continued to blossom.  Richardson scored 42 points and Dudley did just about everything else—18 rebounds, 2 blocks, and a steal.  He also drew numerous charges and generally played like a muthaf—in’ spiteful, delightful, eyeful. 
 
Winning feels better than anything—even better thinking of Jeff McInnis in the past tense.  Over the last two games, we’ve hit 52-of-70 foul shots, committed just 22 total turnovers, had 8 of the 10 starters score in the double-digits, and exhibited crunch-time defense (just 37 total fourth-quarter points allowed)—is this how it feels to cheer for the Spurs every game?  Woooowww.  

Read More

Bobcats / Warriors Thoughts

Posted by on Feb 2, 2008 in Golden State Warriors | 0 comments

Via BobcatsPlanet member – The Beagle

 Random thoughts about the game:

1.  It’s criminal that JD isn’t
geting any regular playing time.  Admittedly, he was playing against
their bench, but he was working his ass off on the boards, great
passes, and he did well on Jackson when he was still in the game in the
3rd.  What a waste Sad

2. 
This is the best kind of loss you can possibly ask for; you can have
your "moral victories" and the inherent heartbreak that accompanies it,
but give me a good ol’ ass kicking.  This was the least frustrating
loss since the Suns game earlier in the season.  It was apparent, we
wouldn’t have won this game if we played good.  They were on, just like
last year; contested 3s or not, they were going in all night long, and
it was the 2nd qtr burst that combined with our offensive woes that put
it away.  Also, we have plenty of rest for tomorrow night’s game.

3. 
It was a blast seeing the Nut (AKA Ryan Hollins) have a mini dunk fest
and get T’ed up for taunting after slamming over O’bryant so hard he
knocked him to the ground.  Was it classy? No.  Was it funny? Yes. 
Give me funny on a night like this.

4.  Despite the rest for our
starter’s in the 4th, tomorrow night is probably going to be ugly. 
Raymond irritated his ankle again, and GW sprained his ankle also, so
it’s likely we’ll be without one of them, and highly possible will be
without both of them.   Sad

5. 
This season is crumbling before our eyes.  We’re 11 under for the first
time this season (I’m pretty sure) and it’ll be 13 under after this
trip is over.  I thought our guys could rise to the challenge, but it’s
not going to happen apparently.  It’s disappointing, but I’m okay with
it: the fact is we are a VERY flawed team with an even more flawed
coach.  Still….maybe we can reel off some wins once Boykins gets into
the flow, and then we should be right back in the chase, but there are
no expectation on my part.  I just want the guys to continue to bust
their hump, and not give up.

6.  I can’t see the Warriors
getting into the playoffs this year at all.  They are such a flawed
team.  I’d "Box and 1" their asses, with the 1 being BD.  The box would
keep Ellis from getting to the basket over and over and over and over. 
I’d widen the box significantly so that you can close out quickly on
their wings Jackson and Barnes, and I’d invite them with the wide box
to look inside for their scoring, which they can’t do against good
teams.  As long as you don’t try to run with this team, you’re good. 
They hate to play defense it looks like, and overplay the passing lanes
which makes them susceptible to being outmanned in the half court. 
They’re a good team, and they’re a great team when they’re making their
shots, and when they play a poor defensive team, but they aren’t that good.

Read More

Bobcats 98, Warriors 90: Blogcat’s Take

Posted by on Feb 4, 2007 in Golden State Warriors | 0 comments

It wasn’t exactly I Spit On Your Grave, but it was still pretty satisfying revenge: on Saturday the Bobcats reciprocated last week’s abomination to the Golden State Warriors with a 98-90 win. Both teams had played the night before—sort of; the Cats’ had their 20-point debacle in Cleveland, and the Warriors lost to Philly (only by 1, but the key words are “lost,” “to,” and “Philly,”)—so fatigue bogged things down at times.

Oh yeah, one other word about that Cleveland game (before I flush it out of my mind’s toilet): according to keen observer Ran (whose comments can be read here), the proper name for Drew Gooden’s hair-, um, “style” is a “duck tail.” According to Ran, Drew Gooden refers to himself as a “child of the 80s” whenever explaining his controversial hirsute philosophy. A-ha! Hmmm. I was a child of the 80s too, and yet I have no memory of that hairstyle whatsoever (although I do remember the weekday afternoon Disney cartoon by the same name), unless I missed an episode of Diff'rent Strokes in which Dudley rocked it or something. Oh wait, now that I think about it, someone in the band "A-HA" quite possibly could have sported a duck tail.

But the more pressing question is, even if it was popular, is that really Drew's only actual justification for the haircut–that he's a "child of the 80s"? Since when is living in a particular decade a reason for getting a certain haircut? I mean, like I said, I lived during that time too, but I have absolutely ZERO urge to suddenly part my hair down the middle and feather it, let alone get a rat-tail or a flock-of-seagulls 'do.

All I can say is hopefully this “what would the 80s do?” line of thinking doesn't end up influencing his other behavioral choices, such as whether or not to become a coke addict, whether or not to support Central American dictatorships, whether or not to invest in Savings & Loan institutions, etc…

Anyway, back to the game! The Warriors were in their road blues, and unlike Gooden, I WILL credit them for sticking to their 80s roots, as I’ve always enjoyed GS’s color scheme (although I don’t quite understand why their insignias are on the backs of their left legs—it makes it look like the entire team mistakenly put their shorts on backwards), which I feel is appropriately flashy and futuristic-looking but without overdoing it a la the Barkley-era Rockets. And in light of News14 once again not showing the game (nor are they showing "news" for their matter, just a bunch of infomercials, although they are at least on on channel "14"), I should also point out that I’ve always enjoyed the Warriors’ announcers as well. Bob Fitzgerald and Jim Barnett are even-keeled, rational, and very gracious guests. They complimented the Cats for "doing it the right way” by building through the draft and not owing anyone a huge salary (well, except Melvin Ely, the one guy we’re NOT playing) and were also optimistic in their forecast for Charlotte now that Michael Jordan’s an owner (holy crap he is, I’d practically forgotten about that). I’d like to return the compliments to the Bay Area, as I think they’ve finally got a bunch of young guys who can go on to be great Warriors.

But wars not make one great, and neither does 12/44 shooting in the second half. Golden State had pushed the lead to 10 late in the first half but crumbled down the stretch and ruined a superb effort by Andres Biedrins (15 points, 18 boards—10 on offense—2 blocks, 2 steals), who could pass for Primoz Brezec’s long-lost (and more talented) brother. Whether it was shooting field goals, shooting 3-pointers, shooting free throws, or shootin’ at the walls of heartache (bang-bang), Al Harrington IS the Warrior, but his 7/20 performance (and 1/5 from downtown) cost the team in the end.

No Harrington miss was more painful than the one that was blocked spectacularly by Gerald Wallace with just under ten to play and the Cats clinging to a 4-point lead. Harrington went driving for a sure slam, but Wallace crushed it away as if it were shot out of a cannon. I haven’t heard a crowd gasp in sudden disbelief like that since Antonio Tarver knocked out Roy Jones in their rematch. G-Dub (21 points, 16 rebounds, 6 steals, 3 blocks, 2 steals) is the glue holding this team together right now, the gum under the shoe, the snot in the nose—he’s the man. Raymond Felton also had 22 (and came back bravely from a bizarre, inadvertent elbow from Harrington that knocked him on his face—man, I only just now realized that Harrington was the “Forrest Gump" of this game, randomly figuring in all the key moments), and Emeka Okafor put up 16 and 11. As a team we kept the turnovers low and allowed the Warriors to shoot themselves in the foot via the 3-pointer. Great win.

I see the Warriors are playing the Pacers next—how confusing is THAT one going to be? I wonder if any gambling sites are creating an over/under for a “Mistaken Passes to Former Teammates” category.

{moscomment} 

Read More

Warriors 131, Bobcats 105: Blogcat’s Take

Posted by on Jan 28, 2007 in Golden State Warriors | 0 comments

“After an emotional win last night,” commentator Matt Devlin said in the middle of the Bobcats blowout loss to Golden State, “you could see a game like this developing.” This game didn’t “develop” so much as it “detonated.” I didn’t hang around long enough to find out what the official Wachovia Pivotal Moment of the Game was, but my vote would have been for the tip-off. The Bobcats got off to about as good a start as those troopers jumping out of the boats in Saving Private Ryan, trailing 21-2 after about 30 seconds. And then it got worse. How bad was it? Garbage time lasted long enough for Walter Herrmann to score 19 points.

Players are fond of likening their great performances to video games. “It was like a Playstation game out there,” Gilbert Arenas will say after scoring 40 points. The Bobcats were like video games too last night, except they were a bunch of Atari 2600’s out there. Admittedly, a three-game West Coast trip is brutal, and they were playing for the second night in a row after an OT-win, but they looked positively asleep out there. They left the Warriors open to hit 10/17 3-pointers, turned it over 22 times, and were lazily outscored 30-5 on fast breaks. They were twice whistled for delay of game calls for not being in proper uniform—presumably they’d forgotten to tuck their pajamas in.

After giving up 40 in the first quarter, the Cats—to their credit—actually cut the deficit down to 7. Gerald Wallace put in a spirited 19 points, and Okafor, who may have proven that he can literally get a double-double in his sleep, had 10 points and 12 boards. But Raymond Felton had just 3 points, Matt Carroll had 1, and then there was that pesky thing known as the second half…

Just a few games removed from their 8-player Extreme Makeover trade, I’d say Golden State is poised for a run. They made me a believer, at least; I feeling like calling them Golden Shower State for the way they pissed all over us. They already had a strong nucleus (or “nuculus,” as the President would say) with B-Davis, Monta Ellis, Mickael Pietrus, and up-and-comers Andris Biedrins and Matt Barnes. Now you add Al Harrington, who dropped us like his Mohawk with 29 points on 9/11 shooting, and Stephen Jackson, who had 17 points? Yikes. It wasn’t until late in the 3rd quarter that the delighted Oakland crowd demanded—and got—Sarunas Jasikevicius, but he’s also fully capable as well. As long as Jackson can avoid more headlines such as this one on ESPN.com a few days ago: “Judge: Strip Club Incident Violated Jackson's Probation,” (question: isn’t that headline kinda missing the main gist of that affair, which was that Jackson fired a gun several times at a car?), the Warriors will be fine, especially when Jason Richardson returns…

{moscomment} 

Read More