TheBeagle’s NCAA Tourney / Bobcats @ Blazers weekend

Posted by on Mar 31, 2008 in Portland Trailblazers | 0 comments

The latest from long time BobcatsPlanet member TheBeagle on his March Madness / Charlotte Bobcats weekend.

A crazy, bewildering, fun whirlwind weekend wraps up. My love of the NCAA tournament and Tar Heel basketball is not something I conceal, so the fact that this past weekend played out like it did would be incredible in and of itself, but add in to that the fact that my dad’s old Army buddy (whose name I won’t drop here, out of modesty and privacy) who is longstanding icon of the Philadelphia sportswriting and talk-radio scene was in town to cover the regionals in Charlotte. I can’t even begin to explain the stories this guy has to tell, the people he’s spoken with, the person he was talking to in the living room Friday night (!!!!) on his cell……just a trip!! (I think I now have more dirt on the AI-Larry Brown feud than any professed NBA analyst that’s ever been employed at ESPN.)

Just a quickie: his forte is college basketball (covered every Final 4 since ’92, but a handful before that), but even in Philly he was surprisingly well-versed in our Bobcats. Covering Penn State basketball, he told me he was able to talk to JRich individually a handful of times when Michigan St played Penn St, and he said he is as genuine and good-natured as he comes off on-camera. Like us, he thought it was a great draft day trade for us when it went down. He’s a gamer who’s purpose is to continue to improve and help his teams win games. Like everyone else, he loves Jared, and told me he was the steal of the draft. Matt Carroll is the man; he went to high school 5 minutes from where the guy lives, and he knew the family very well. He was closer to his brother, Pat, since he went to St. Joe’s, but was very high on Matt and you could tell he was proud how hard the hometown Philly native worked to make it to where he is now. He was shocked at how little development Emeka has shown since UConn days, but he really thinks it has to do with such poor coaching since he’s been here…but there’s no coaching that can improve stone hands. He’s still high on Raymond and says everyone should calm down (the family friend telling me this is not a native Philadelphian, obviously, which explains his even keel and patience with athletes) and realize how much better of a PG he really is compared to the majority of PGs out there. He absolutely loves Gerald and thinks he’s one of the most freakish athletes in the league, and that he his actually a lot more well known around the country than I thought, which is a good thing; he deserves national recognition.

Well, due to sleep deprivation, he had to head off to sleep before the Sonics game was over, wishing them luck. At the time they were down by 1, and through persistence, they pulled it out and we won 2 in a row!

Saturday, through some miracle or another, he’s able to get me and my dad seats in Sec. 103 for the game, while he’s sitting on first row media table directly across for the Louisville bench. After some drama, and lots and lots of standing (no one sat down in the second half in the lower bowl that I know of), the Heels pull it out, and we get a really good view of the celebration and ritual net-cutting….that never gets old, even if it’s not the final net-cutting. Anyhow, we hang around, and the friend comes out and gives us his pressbook with all kinds of awesomeness in it (if you’re into sports collectible stuff that you can’t just go out and buy), and tells me I’m two for two that night. I smile and ask him what he means, and he tells me the ‘Cats just won their 3rd straight!!!

Me and dad didn’t get home ’til 2am (which isn’t all that late to me, but due to the craziness of the last few days, and lack of enough sleep) and we were worn slap-out, but damned if that wasn’t the best weekend I’ve had in recent memory.

I finished watching the Blazers game a couple hours ago, and I was amazed at the team I saw out there in the 4th. Sure, Roy was out, but the Blazers were gunning hard for this game, trying to get a win, and we took their best shot, and with stellar defense, and Raymond, chanelling Hansbrough and March’s past, put us on his back and we finish with an unexpected 3-1 road trip.

Wow, such a shame the players didn’t have the coach they needed, cause I know this is a playoff team. We’re every bit as good as Atlanta, and not far off from Toronto, Philly and Washington to boot. Oh well, some answers are starting to become clearer, and maybe with a change here and there, and a ping pong bounce here and there, next year will be what this year was supposed to have been!

 

Read More

Blogcat’s Take, 11/20

Posted by on Nov 20, 2007 in Portland Trailblazers, Seattle Supersonics | 0 comments

Just about everything from Saturday night’s game against Seattle went perfectly.  First, traveling across the country, coming off a double-OT game the night before, playing the dreaded 4th game in 5 nights, and in general sucking, the Sonics were handed to us on a silver platter.  Second, Charlotte continued to defeat the teams that it should defeat.  Third, Jason Richardson justified my love by asserting his ability to dominate, drilling 4 3-pointers for 14 points in three minutes during the 3rd quarter and thereby catalyzing a victory.  Fourth, Ryan Hollins put in another 25 minutes of solid work, collecting 6 points, 7 rebounds, a block, and a steal; as long as Hollins keeps this up, Coach Vincent can continue to yank starter Primoz Brezec faster than Viva Laughlin.  Finally, we held Seattle to just 31% shooting and committed just 15 turnovers in another inspired team effort.
 
In fact, all in all, there was just one small problem: I couldn’t watch any if it because the game wasn’t televised.  I swear to Pat Riley, I was pretty darned angry when it wasn’t even available on League Pass.  I tried to make due with watching the running ticker on NBA.com, but after about twenty minutes or so, ayo!  I was tired of using technology.  Instead I flipped over to the Nets-Heat game, observed Vince Carter in a suit, and gave silent prayers of thanks to our management for not signing him to a 4-year, $66 million deal (with the whole MJ-VC-UNC thing, it had been one of my greatest fears this past spring—in fact, next time I see a Jumpman insignia, I’m going to cross myself).  At least they ran some highlights on NBA TV Daily the next day, although they were of the "cheerleader-cam" sort: directly under the basket and hard to make anything out.  I remember this happened twice last season, but not until much later in the year.  
Oh, and one other semi-related note on this one: did anyone see Peter King’s “MMQB” column on SI.com yesterday—the part where he wrote about the ongoing NFL Network-Cable war?  King actually wrote the line, “I don't watch the Network much, because I don't have time to watch much NFL programming other than games…I have nothing against it, and I'm sure I'm missing things by not watching the regular programming. But there's a sea of NFL programming on ESPN and Fox and everywhere else, and you could go blind watching it all.”  Umm, anyone have a problem with this admission?  King doesn’t have time?  How could you be a paid commentator—who covers only one sport, I might add—and not watch the network that’s solely devoted to your sport?  And then the “ESPN and Fox is enough for me” part—brother, no wonder they all sound alike…We need some sort of indie-sportswriting revolutionary figure to topple these empires.  I can see it now: t-shirts of The Basketball Jones’s Skeets and Taz looking like Che Guevara.
 
Anyway, onto last night’s game with Portland, wherein we got our first look at their prized hulking rookie…Josh McRoberts.  Josh played his first minute (not minutes) of the year, but he didn’t do much other than exhibit his wild-looking hair.  Jeez, the last time I saw him flaming out at Duke, he had a crew-cut.  Now he looks like he played one of the Dylan parts in I’m Not There.
 
Anyway, onto the game itself.  We were in firm control for the better part of three quarters, thanks to foul trouble to bigs LaMarcus Aldridge, Channing Frye, and Joel Pryzbilla (who’s not much more than a rich man’s Primoz Brezec anyway).  The lackluster play of their interior was a key aspect of Portland’s loss.  "Not to blame LaMarcus and Joel,” Coach Nate McMillan said after the game—and I love when jocks use the phrase, “Not to blame,” because then they go on to do precisely that— “but the two of those guys had two rebounds.”    
 
The Blazers narrowed the score to 40-36 at the half, courtesy of Steve Blake’s ridiculous half-court shot at the buzzer, but we came out charging in the third.  “You never know when it’s going to come,” Coach Sam Vincent said after the game, speaking of Jason Richardson’s 24-point performance.  Actually you do, Coach, it’s going to come in the 3rd quarter.  Richardson had 14 points in his latest third quarter outburst and had us hovering around a double-digit lead.  “Sometimes the basket is the size of an ocean, sometimes it's the size of a cup,” Richardson later told reporters, and for one terrifying second I thought he was going to recite a poem that he had written.  Thankfully, he simply added, “When you see the ocean, you shoot.”
 
All of a sudden, though, the Blazers came back, even briefly leading by 3-points at the beginning of the 4th quarter.  This was mostly due to some really cheesy referee work, in my opinion (not to blame them, but…).   Gerald Wallace and Jeff McInnis both got called for some ludicrous charges and touch fouls (even the Portland announcers believed they were bogus), and of course Crash was crushed on a bunch of drives that weren’t whistled at all.  I think the refs were subconsciously refusing to foul out Aldridge, Frye, Pryzbilla, and Brandon Roy.  Jarrett Jack (18 points) also deserves some huge credit for sparking Portland off the bench, as does Blake (4-5 3’s, 14 points, 6 boards), and even though Roy had a somewhat muted night (14, 5, 5), he was still a 2nd-half force.
 
But Raymond Felton refused to lose, getting 16 of his 24 points and dishing 7 of his 10 assists in the last stanza.  Gerald Wallace also had his 3rd straight 27-pointer, plus six steals and some truly demoralizing stuffs.  Okafor had a solid 12-12 double-double.  And even though neither scored much, Matt Carroll and Ryan Hollins both had 2 huge offensive rebounds to bail out the offense and keep the possessions going.       
         
We’re now 6-4, and yeah, we haven’t exactly been facing the 1996 Bulls night in and night out, but we haven’t been facing the 2007 Bulls either.  These are some solid young teams we’re beating, and the wins are especially impressive when they come despite blowing leads.  And just think, last year at this time we were 2-8.      

Read More

Previewing Portland – By the numbers

Posted by on Nov 18, 2007 in Portland Trailblazers | 0 comments

Portland is coming to Charlotte on Monday November 19th, for a showdown with the Bobcats.  They bring a 4-6 record into the game, as well as a 3 game losing streak…which follows a 4 game winning streak…which itself followed another 3 game losing skid.  Hey, at least they are consistent (for a few games at a time).  The question is, which team are they?  The world-beaters who have already knocked off New Orleans, Dallas, and Detroit?  Or the high-lotto team who has already been blown out by those same Hornets, Denver, and Washington (plus a loss to expected cellar-dweller Philly)?

 Prior to the start of the season, everyone would have said the second.  Portland had traded away Zach Randolph, for no other reason than so he could not corrupt the young (or not) Greg Oden…only to see Greg undergo micro-fracture surgery and be forced to miss the season.  People looked at the team and said they were too young to contend, but to look out for them going forward.  But, they put together a nice winning streak, and people wondered if the future got here early.  Now, those questions are being aside again, because of the recent losses.  As a Bobcats fan, I want to know what to expect for the game:  Are the Bobcats going to have a walk-over, on their way back to 2 games above the mediocre mark, or will they slide back to .500 basketball?

The numbers seem to indicate the former.  In 3 of Portland's 4 wins,  they shot 50% or better from the floor – including against the strong defensive squads of Dallas and Detroit.  How did they manage such hot shooting nights?  Hitting more jumpers than normal.  Overall, 30.7% of made field goals in the league this year are layups or dunks.  In those 3 games, layups and dunks accounts for only 24.1% of Portland's total made baskets, so they were doing unusally well from further from the cup – and that is a trend that is unlikely to continue.  

On defense, Portland gives up more points per possession (ppp) than all but 6 teams in the league, at 1.05 ppp.  A  big factor in this high rate is the fact that Portland hardly ever takes the ball away from their opponents.  They create turnovers on only 13.5% of their opponents' possessions, a mark only Memphis exceeds (in a bad way).  They also do a poor job on the defensive boards, grabbing 69.5% of available defensive rebounds (8th worst in the NBA).  Giving your opponents more initial shots (few turnovers) and more second shots (few defensive rebounds) is not a formula for success.

For comparison, the Bobcats surrender 1.01 ppp, force turnovers on 15.5% of their opponents' possessions, and grab 69.1% of available defensive rebounds.  While the first two numbers are solid, the third is far from it – and made all the more unusual by the fact that the Bobcats are the best offensive rebounding team in the NBA (or second best, according to ESPN).  They pull down 33.2% of their own missed shots, nearly 8% better than Portland's mark.  How they can be so effective on one end and not the other is a bit strange, but not the focus of this post – all that matters is that the Bobcats look ready to expose a weakness of their opponent.

After looking at the numbers behind Portland's wins, I feel better.  In fact, I will make a couple of predictions – the Bobcats win tonight, as long as they hold the Blazers under 50% from the floor.  And second, the Trailblazers are going to start giving up more points if they keep letting the opposition keep the ball so much (hopefully the Bobcats will start on that tonight).

(Most of these numbers can be seen at the Queen City Hoops Stats Page – and the ones that can't yet are going to be added soon). 

 

Queen City Hoops

Read More

Mock News Update

Posted by on Jun 13, 2007 in Portland Trailblazers, Seattle Supersonics | 0 comments

Holy crap, not one but THREE people commented on my last entry!  I was getting so worried that no one ever read this thing that my next blog was just going to be, "Echo!"
 
Anyway, quick update of fake news on this fake draft: the fake Trail Blazers fakely selected Greg Oden (no surprise), and the virtual Sonics took a Durant hologram.  Then the pseudo- Atlanta Hawks–and I swear I'm NOT making this up–selected Al Horfod rather than a point guard.  Makes me wonder if it's actually the real Hawks front office calling the shots on that one. 
 
Then, in a bit of comedy, the imposter Grizzlies first CHEWED OUT the Hawks blogger for taking Horford when they (virtual Atlanta) didn’t need him and replica Memphis did.  And in a bit of mock draft revenge, Memphis selected Conley.  I’m kind of glad Conley’s off the table because something truly bothers me about the way he and Oden keep insisting how they want to be on the same team; I can picture one of them (mostly Conley) pulling a Vince Carter later and insisting on being traded to whatever team Oden's on.
 
Then I got this trade proposal from “Bullets Forever” blogger Mike (a name that continues to crack me up, because they were really only the Bullets for about 25 years), which I will relay to you word-for-word:
———–
MIKE: Do you have any interest in trading for Antonio Daniels?  How does an offer of AD and Darius Songaila for Sean May and the 22nd pick sound?
 
ME: I say no, but let me put it to my web page for due diligence.
 
MIKE: Would you consider AD for #22 and Brevin Knight?
 
ME: I don't think so, man.  AD's a year older, costs $1.1 million more, averaged 2 points, 3 assists, and 1 steal LESS per game than Brevin, plus I'd have to throw in a 22nd pick for him?  Am I missing something?
————
I love it!  He gives me a crappy offer, and when I reject it, he turns around and gives me a WORSE offer.  
 
All right, so I’m getting a couple of theories here.  KAPZX and Dwyan both are anti-Joaquin Noah.  In fact, KAPZX hates Noah so much that he suggested an amendment to the draft rules wherein I could send fake agents (whom I visualize as looking like Agent Smith from “The Matrix”) over to Georgetown University and try to talk Roy Hibbert (“Miiiiiisster Hibbert…” the agents would say) into re-entering the draft.  I love the idea, but I don’t think that’s going to fly with Dungeon Master Mike (especially when I just basically laughed in his face over the AD-BK trade proposal).  
 
I totally agree about Noah—he’s probably just going to be a more expensive Anderson Varejao.  We should always be suspicious when big guys are described as “high-energy” because it’s generally a euphemism for “uncoordinated spazz.”  AIRBOBCAT likes Yi, although he probably won’t be available by the time it's our turn.  So it sounds like we should be drafting according to skill and not need, in which case, I would agree that Brewer is probably the best available player at #8.  No one seems to know anything at all about Spencer, and that probably applies to most of the state of Washington as well.  So my new tentative plan is that unless Yi is available at #8, I’m probably going to go with Brewer—agreed?
 
More fake updates to follow, and here is the link to the SB Nation web page that lists the picks and the rationales by each selecting team (or types of crack smoked, if you’re the Atlanta blogger):
{moscomment} 

Read More

Trail Blazers 127, Bobcats 90: Blogcat’s Take

Posted by on Mar 2, 2007 in Portland Trailblazers | 0 comments

Okay, okay, I take it all back what I said a few games ago about not wanting Vince Carter. I would take Vince Carter. Hell, I’d take Jimmy Carter at this point, if I thought it could help. I’d do anything to avoid having to endure another game like last night’s debacle in Portland. Once again without Woods and Prior—I mean, Okafor and May—the Bobcats were blown away by 37 points, their second-worst deficit ever (and that’s saying something; in terms of severity, it’s comparable to DMX’s second worst run-in with the cops ever). For a large portion of the second half we were down by over 40—40!—man, I want to drink my 40’s, not trail by them.

Every Rose Arena has its thorn, and for the Bobcats it was LeMarcus Aldridge, who scored 30 points on 12-19 shooting (and sat most of the 4th). Of course, it’s hard to miss when every other shot is an unopposed alley-oop. I already compared our defense to a bowling alley last night, so where do I go from there? The Maginot Line? Arena football? Saddam Hussein’s lawyers? I’m taking requests. Martell Webster (20 points) also steamrolled over the Bobcats’ crumbling infrastructure early and often, and the only remaining suspense after the first quarter was when commentator Matt Devlin would realize that Webster’s first name wasn’t “Martin.” (answer: with ten minutes to go in the second quarter, but give Matt credit: he then jokingly asked if Martell “was Daniel’s brother,” and it’s that sort of brilliant humor that lets me laugh through my tears.) Meanwhile, Zach Randolph (20 points) picked his teeth with Primoz Brezec and Ryan Hollins, and I think it’s safe to say at this point that Brandon Roy (14 points, 9 assists, 8 rebounds) has the inside track on Adam Morrison for Rookie of the Year.

Then, to put the icing on the turd, we learned that Okafor is headed back to Charlotte to get an MRI on his calf and may be gone 6 weeks?!? What in the world!? I never thought of the calf as a very sophisticated part of the human anatomy. What is it with this team and seemingly innocuous injuries that end up knocking out players for weeks? Sean May has a sore knee and he’s out indefinitely, Brevin Knight pulls his groin and they end up cutting out his stomach…Jesus, at this point, I’ll just be happy if they find out Emeka doesn’t have cancer.

I guess we’ll all be getting a good look at Hollins then. He had 6 points through the first half, but he didn’t get any more after that, and unfortunately his fouls caught up and eventually tied with his scoring. And where was Derek Anderson? With all those young guys on the Blazers, they should have been ripe for some of Anderson’s veteran bamboozling. Instead: 0 points in 7 minutes? It was the worst “DA” performance since Mike Nifong.

Forget it, this hurts too much. I’d rather think about something less depressing right now, like Darfur. I just hope I can contain my excitement until the Bobcats next game on Sunday in Seattle. Will we be able to stay within 40? Will we at least hold the Sonics to under 30 points for one of the quarters? Will Okafor need to have his leg amputated? Tune in to find out…

{moscomment} 

Read More

Trail Blazers 108, Bobcats 100 (OT): Blogcat’s Take

Posted by on Feb 10, 2007 in Portland Trailblazers | 0 comments

The Bobcats lost in overtime to the Trail Blazers Friday night, and in the face of wrenching disappointment I—like any good American—immediately searched for someone to blame.  Fortunately, I found him: Adam Morrison; clearly, it’s all his fault.  It’s Morrison’s fault that Charlotte blew a late lead, that we’re in last place, that attendance is so low, that the country is trapped in two un-winnable Middle East conflicts, that Nas hasn’t been able to put together one good album since Illmatic, and I wouldn’t be surprised if that Super Bowl Snickers commercial was his idea.
 
Actually, I don’t think any of that, but I’m apparently in the minority, because to many sportswriters, Morrison’s rookie year has been appallingly, almost offensively bad.  Look at ESPN.com’s summation of Charlotte midway through the year: “Morrison's catastrophic season has undone a lot of good work by Okafor, Wallace, May and Carroll.”  “Catastrophic”?  The kid is second in rookie scoring.  “Catastrophic” should be reserved for describing levee failures or possibly the decision to make Hannibal Rising, not Adam Morrison.  I honestly believe Morrison would take less criticism if he barely played, if Coach Bickerstaff just threw him out there for a few minutes every game a la Paul Millsap.  And that’s crazy.
 
And there are more salient points of blame, anyway.  Fouls, for starters: we kept making them and we couldn’t shoot them.  We went just 21/33 from the line, including several critical misses down the stretch and in overtime (which also featured Emeka Okafor fouling out early on).  Meanwhile, we gave Portland 45 free throw chances.  And how about the no-call on Brevin Knight?  With the game tied and about two seconds left on the clock in regulation, BK took an easily observable broadside elbow from Jarret Jack while heaving up a half-court attempt, and the only thing that blew was the buzzer.  Despite the obvious contact, because it occurred near mid-court, I guess the refs ruled it “uncatchable.”  Or something.
 
But here’s an original idea: if you want to blame someone for the loss to the Trail Blazers, why not blame the Trail Blazers?  After all, one of the biggest reasons we lost to them was that they scored more points than us.  Specifically, Zach Randolph scored 40 points to go with 9 rebounds—I blame him most of all.  Interestingly, the Portland TV announcers were excited early on about what they believed to be a “mismatch” between Randolph and Gerald Wallace.  It turns out they were only partially right, as it was a mismatch on both sides—neither guy could guard the other.  Gerald struggled all night with Randolph’s accurate shooting and overall girth, while Randolph in turn struggled with Wallace’s pesky tendency to, you know, move around and stuff with the ball.         
 
There was also Brandon Roy’s groin-kick of a 3-pointer to tie it up with 8 seconds left.  After the game, Coach Bickerstaff and Wallace lamented the fact that the defense didn’t push out on the perimeter and basically “let” Roy make that three.  I feel their pain (believe me, I do), but c’mon, that was a pretty good shot.  Sometimes you’ve got to give credit to the opposition—or in this case, place proper blame on them.  So Brandon Roy, it was all your fault.
 
But you know who the biggest culprit was in all of this?  Obviously, it was Dan Dickau.  Yep, in the second quarter, the Bobcats went on a 12-0 run, and Portland Coach Nate McMillan was so incensed with his team’s poor play* that he threw Dickau out there.  It was a brilliant move, and one that finally demonstrated Dickau’s true worth to me.  Dickau’s sole reason for being on the team seems to be so McMillan has got a way of signaling his displeasure, and Dan is perfect for this role.  After all, just imagine yourself as say, Jamaal Magloire, getting banished to the bench, and watching tiny Dan Dickau running around out there like Cory Feldman in Lucas?  How infuriating would that be? 
So there you go.  Lots of good people to blame, just pick one, curse him appropriately, and I guarantee you’ll feel better.  Just remember: whatever you do, don’t put the blame on you. 
 
On the positive side, BK is back!  He’s still clearly adjusting to living in his newly refurbished stomach, but he’s a welcome sight.  I’m also glad that Jeff McInnis is continuing to get in the mix, and I liked his new high-sock look as well.  I noticed that Ben Wallace of Chicago coincidentally started going “high-sock” the night before in Sacramento—must be some sort of cornrow telepathy… 
              
*In fact, so were the announcers, who seemed particularly disgusted by Portland’s poor shooting.  Ummm…this team’s only got a couple more wins than us, what do they normally shoot?
{moscomment} 

Read More